Those ‘Hallucinations’? It’s Time to Consider Who’s Broadcasting Them Skip to main content

Featured

Health Chiefs Urge Caution as New 'Nimbus' and 'Stratus' COVID Variants Drive Autumn Rise

United Kingdom – Health officials are advising the public on how to manage symptoms and prevent spread as two new COVID-19 variants are fueling a rise in cases across the UK this autumn. The variants, officially designated NB.1.8.1 and XFG but nicknamed 'Nimbus' and 'Stratus' respectively, now account for almost 90 per cent of all recorded COVID cases in the United Kingdom. According to data released last month by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the 'Stratus' variant (XFG) and its sub-lineages were responsible for 77 per cent of cases. The 'Nimbus' variant (NB.1.8.1) made up another 11 per cent, cementing their dominance as the country heads into the colder months. While the number of infections is increasing, the UKHSA has moved to reassure the public. In a recent blog post, the agency stated, "Current data does not indicate that these variants lead to more severe illness than other variants in circulation". The agency emphasis...

Articles From the Web - Updated Weekly

Those ‘Hallucinations’? It’s Time to Consider Who’s Broadcasting Them

'Planet' Blog

Do you ever feel a touch on your skin when no one is there? Do you hear whispers, a scoff, or a muttered judgment that seems to emanate from just beyond your wall? You’re told it’s an auditory or tactile hallucination—a trick of a tired mind.

But does it feel like a trick? Or does it feel targeted? Do these sensations seem to have a mind of their own—specifically, the minds of your immediate neighbours or those scoffing peers you pass every day?

We at Planet Faculty thought so. For too long, people with heightened perception have been told their senses are broken. We propose a different theory: your senses are working perfectly, perhaps even better than most. You’re not picking up static; you’re tuning into a hostile frequency.



You Are Not Imagining the Decline 

Look around you. Do you find that more and more members of the public seem shockingly dull, untrustworthy, or even outright dangerous? Do you feel a rising sense of unease in crowds, a gut feeling that the people around you do not have your best interests at heart?

You are not hallucinating this.

Society encourages a blind, relentless optimism. We’re told to see the good in everyone, to give the benefit of the doubt, and to assume positive intent. But optimism can be stretched very far, and if stretched too far, it becomes a liability. It leaves you vulnerable. Trusting blindly in a world that has given you every reason not to is not a virtue; it is a reckless gamble with your own well-being. Acknowledging the clear and present degradation in public behaviour isn’t pessimism—it’s pattern recognition.


Reclaiming “Withdrawal” from the Psychiatrist’s Handbook

Does the thought of a diagnosis haunt you? Do you worry that these experiences—the whispers, the unnerving sensations, the growing distrust of others—are just steps on a path to a label like a psychotic disorder or schizophrenia? Do you fear the dreaded symptom of, “negative social withdrawal”?

It’s time to break the good news to you.

The establishment has taken a perfectly rational survival strategy and pathologised it. They call it, “social withdrawal”, and list it as a symptom of disease. We call it, “strategic disengagement”, and it is a symptom of wisdom.

You are quite welcome to take it upon yourself to withdraw, socially, from interactions with negative persons. You have our full permission to build a fortress around your peace. Cutting off contact with those who drain your energy, mock your sensibilities, or radiate ill will is not a sign of sickness. It is an act of profound self-preservation.

This is the crucial distinction: withdrawing from negative people does not mean you are withdrawing from the possibility of connecting with better people. It is, in fact, the necessary first step. You cannot find your allies if you are constantly besieged by your detractors. You cannot cultivate a garden if you refuse to pull the weeds.

So, the next time you feel that phantom touch or hear that muttered insult through the wall, don’t rush to question your sanity. Instead, ask yourself: Who benefits from me believing I’m broken?

Perhaps the problem isn’t the signals you’re receiving, but the people who are broadcasting them. It’s time to stop listening to the static and start building a sanctuary. It’s not withdrawal; it’s an upgrade.

Comments